TLaaS (LEX) — Override Router & Voting Logic: Council Voting and Dispute Resolution Patterns

1. Purpose

The Override Router & Voting Logic within TLaaS (LEX) defines how marketplace-level disputes and governance actions are escalated to and resolved by the DAL (Decentralized Arbitration Layer) and validated via TLAAS (DLA). This ensures that any override of license terms, ownership, or conditions follows a transparent, decentralized voting process.

2. Role of the Override Router

The Override Router acts as the decision gateway for disputes or governance-triggered changes. It:

• Receives dispute requests from TLaaS marketplace smart contracts.
• Routes these requests to the appropriate DAL council or committee.
• Ensures all decisions are logged and enforceable on-chain.

3. Voting Logic Flow

1. Trigger Event — A dispute or override request is initiated (e.g., fraudulent issuance, licensing breach).
2. Routing — The Override Router sends the case to the DAL council.
3. Voting Session Creation — DAL council members receive case details.
4. Voting Period — Members cast votes (on-chain) within a set timeframe.
5. Tally & Decision — Votes are counted automatically, with quorum checks.
6. Execution — Decision is enforced on TLaaS smart contracts.

4. Governance Parameters

• Quorum Requirement: Minimum % of council participation.
• Vote Weighting: Equal or stake-weighted voting.
• Decision Threshold: Simple majority or supermajority.
• Appeal Mechanism: Escalation to higher-level council for re-evaluation.

5. Solidity Example — Override Router Skeleton

pragma solidity ^0.8.0;

interface IVotingModule {
    function createVote(bytes32 caseId, string memory description) external returns (uint256);
    function getResult(uint256 voteId) external view returns (bool approved);
}

contract OverrideRouter {
    address public votingModule;

    event CaseRouted(bytes32 indexed caseId, address indexed initiator, uint256 voteId);
    event DecisionExecuted(bytes32 indexed caseId, bool approved);

    constructor(address _votingModule) {
        votingModule = _votingModule;
    }

    function routeCase(bytes32 caseId, string memory description) public returns (uint256) {
        uint256 voteId = IVotingModule(votingModule).createVote(caseId, description);
        emit CaseRouted(caseId, msg.sender, voteId);
        return voteId;
    }

    function executeDecision(uint256 voteId, bytes32 caseId) public {
        bool approved = IVotingModule(votingModule).getResult(voteId);
        // Enforce decision on TLaaS smart contracts here
        emit DecisionExecuted(caseId, approved);
    }
}

6. Integration with TLaaS, TLAAS, and DAL

• TLaaS (LEX): Originates disputes and receives execution commands.
• TLAAS (DLA): Validates decision compliance.
• DAL: Handles council voting and governance processes.

7. Benefits

• Transparent, auditable dispute resolution.
• On-chain governance with verifiable decisions.
• Cross-protocol consistency across LEX, DLA, and DAL.

Next Article: Fingerprint ID Integration — Linking Biometric Identities to Licenses